RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04516
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, blocks 19a/b be corrected to show his current address and current spouse and address.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He remarried in 2003; therefore, his DD Form 214 should be updated to reflect his current spouse and current address.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 12 Aug 77.
On 31 Aug 98, the applicant was honorably discharged and retired, effective 1 Sep 98, and was credited with 21 years and 19 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The sole purpose of the address listed in block 19a (member's mailing address after separation) and 19b (nearest relative) of the DD Form 214 is for the delivery of the form to the veteran. The address listed in block 19b is only used when the first attempt to deliver the document to the veteran's address in 19a fails. With the applicant already in receipt of their DD Form 214, the information in block l9b has no further use, is administrative, and has no impact on veteran benefits or entitlements. The data the applicant provides became effective in 2003, five years after the 31 Aug 98 effective date of his DD Form 214.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:
After careful consideration of applicants request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), §1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to file in a timely manner.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04516 in Executive Session on 23 Oct 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04516 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 13.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR dated 25 Nov 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 14.
3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02168
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02168 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: Block 11, Primary Specialty, be changed to reflect he served as a Military Training Leader for four years and as 3A051 for four years. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05017
The personal information listed on the applicants DD Form 214 match all documents in her official military personnel record (Name, Social Security Number, Date of Birth, Home of Record at Time of Entry). Based on her signature throughout her military record, there is no evidence of her contesting her identity, personal information, or that the relative listed in Block 19b of her DD Form 214 not being valid. Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 16 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03500
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning the applicants request for BMT Honor Graduate status or the SAEMR. A thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record revealed no documentation which establishes the applicant was awarded either the Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon or the SAEMR. Since the applicant received his DD Form 214, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05658 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: a. Should the Board direct other corrections to the applicants DD Form 214, it would then be appropriate to administratively correct the address listed in item 19a. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05542
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 8 Aug 83 separation, Item 19, Mailing Address after Separation, be changed to San Antonio, TX. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his mailing address after separation. The applicant failed to provide supporting documentation that the Florida address was in error.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00905
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00905 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be corrected to reflect Reduction in Force. It has been 22 years since the applicant separated. We have carefully reviewed applicant's submission and the entire record, and we do not find a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05326
The Board should consider his application in the interest of justice as he has a record of three honorable discharges and a clean DD Form 214. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. In another 1etter dated 9 Aug 14, the applicant disputes the calculated time he was in Iceland as a member of Ground Defense Forces Iceland. The applicant did not file his request to correct his record to reflect his service in Ground Defense Forces Iceland within three years...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05261
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 21 Mar 89 to 13 Oct 87 to include credit for the time he spent in Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp (AFROTC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03513
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The record shows that the applicant was counseled several times concerning his course work and study habit. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...